While it’s likely that the 1621 feast between European colonists and native Wampanoag that we associate with the “first Thanksgiving”did发生,传统主义的起源itions we continue to uphold (specifically, the menu) aren’t so crystalline. Let’s rank their accuracy, for funsies.
TheLibrary of Congressassures us that, yes, turkey on Thanksgiving is historically accurate. But the best existing account of the Pilgrims’ harvest feast,Mourt's Relation: A Journal of the Pilgrims at Plymouth, never explicitly mentions the bird. Wild fowl makes an appearance though, so it’s reasonable to assume native wild turkey could have graced the table. After all, the birddoesfeed a crowd. 7/10
There were no flour mills in 1600s New England, so stuffing made from wheat bread was unlikely. (There might’ve been bread, but it was probably made from maize.) 0/10
Therewasseafood, but it was more like eel and clams than lobster. 5/10
Considering white potatoesweren’t cultivated as a crop in North American until the 1700s, there were no heaps of mashed spuds on the table. And sweet potatoeshadn’t yet been introducedfrom their native Caribbean, so the casserole is out. 0/10
Cranberries? Sure thing. But you can’t have cranberry sauce without sugar, which was a rare luxury product in the 17th century. 2/10
Pumpkin pie requires flour and sugar, so you know the odds are already against it. There might’ve been pumpkins and other gourds, butthe ubiquitous pie wasn’t a staple until the 18th century. (BTW, this flour thing is bad news for gravy, too.) 1/10
But good news: Some types of beans were likely to have appeared at the feast, along with squash and other produce native to the area. (Nary a frizzled onion or can of mushroom soup in sight, though.) Let’s give a round of applause to the vegetable side dishes, which are the best part of the meal to begin with. 8/10